PC Talk:Asshattery - Revision history

Ferrispc at 11:14, 24 September 2007

Ferrispc — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:14:54 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:14, 24 September 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I'm going to remove the subentries that are not quantifiable as I do not think they add to the argument.		I'm going to remove the subentries that are not quantifiable as I do not think they add to the argument.
		+
		+	moved to this page
		+	<br>
		+	== Battles for which stats are not available ==
		+	Add to table once stats can be deduced/metagamed:<br>
		+	<br>
		+	kobolds everywhere encounter during Crown of the Kobold King<br>
		+	1st level adventure critters that had DR<br>
		+	tentacle monster (hundreds upon hundreds of tentacles)<br>
		+	spell-stiched ghoul encouters in Forshantir I and Forshantir II<br>

Ferrispc — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:13:17 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:13, 24 September 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I agree, it was going well until I invited some asshats into the editing process. Nobody besides me seemed interested in looking up CRs and ELs and we have a genuine lack of information in some cases concerning monster names and quantity. I'm going to remove the separate puzzle event entry because I actually think that was a cool puzzle and not asshattery as bisquick claims.		I agree, it was going well until I invited some asshats into the editing process. Nobody besides me seemed interested in looking up CRs and ELs and we have a genuine lack of information in some cases concerning monster names and quantity. I'm going to remove the separate puzzle event entry because I actually think that was a cool puzzle and not asshattery as bisquick claims.
		+
		+	I'm going to remove the subentries that are not quantifiable as I do not think they add to the argument.

Ferrispc — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:10:33 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 24 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This page starts out strong, but ends a little weak. I think more demonstrated points would strengthen the case.		This page starts out strong, but ends a little weak. I think more demonstrated points would strengthen the case.
		+
		+	I agree, it was going well until I invited some asshats into the editing process. Nobody besides me seemed interested in looking up CRs and ELs and we have a genuine lack of information in some cases concerning monster names and quantity. I'm going to remove the separate puzzle event entry because I actually think that was a cool puzzle and not asshattery as bisquick claims.

Wardtd — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:25:00 GMT

New page: This page starts out strong, but ends a little weak. I think more demonstrated points would strengthen the case.

New page

This page starts out strong, but ends a little weak. I think more demonstrated points would strengthen the case.